Loading...
Loading...
“100% commission” usually means high agent share plus fees/caps—not free brokerage. Traditional splits fund support differently. Pick a model your company dollar and culture can survive, then automate the math.
About a 15-minute read · Updated 2026-07-31
Name the fees
If the recruiting pitch says 100% but hides desk, E&O, and transaction fees, agents will reverse-engineer the truth on payout day.
Often: agent keeps most of GCI after referrals, pays monthly/annual fees and/or a cap, and the brokerage funds ops from fees + residual company dollar. Traditional splits take a percentage each deal with fewer fixed fees.
Design depth: plans, caps, payouts · calculator: split calculator.
See it as one brokerage OS
Brokurz unifies CRM, transactions, commissions, recruiting, compliance, and branded sites under your brokerage—without stitching vendors together.
Operating costs & margins — a viral split that cannot fund TCs and E&O is a delayed failure.
Brokurz models plans, caps, fees, and CDAs so your chosen economics stay auditable as you recruit.
See it as one brokerage OS
Brokurz unifies CRM, transactions, commissions, recruiting, compliance, and branded sites under your brokerage—without stitching vendors together.
Reminder that disbursements must stay accurate regardless of plan marketing.
Brokurz unifies CRM, transactions, commissions, recruiting, compliance, and branded sites under your brokerage—without stitching vendors together.
It can be—if fees are clear and support is real. Opaque fees make “100%” worse than a clean traditional split.
Only with a fee/capital model that covers supervision and systems. Many start hybrid, then refine.
Real estate tech and brokerage insights, weekly.